Daniel Taub Discusses The Issues Pertaining To The Geneva Accord

Daniel Taub has discussed his interpretation of the nuclear deal between Iran and the UN. As the ambassador from Israel to the United Kingdom he believes the new alliance possible between Israel and the Middle East is a means of countering the threat caused by the nuclear ambitions of Iran.

He stated Israel does not believe the Geneva accord will prevent Iran from gaining a nuclear weapon. He believes previously unacceptable radical partnerships may become a reality in the future.

He also stated there may be cooperation between Israel and the Sunni countries concerned about Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon.

Daniel Taub does not believe Israel is the only one with concerns. He said many countries are in agreement and the immediate differences must be put aside to align the fundamental strategies. This could result in a deepening of these relationships.

He believes these relationships may be successful in spite of any outstanding disputes because the current changes are forcing numerous countries to consider making new choices. He believes this will create partnership opportunities for Israel. He spoke of a potential relationship with areas in the Middle East interested in the development of prosperity.

Daniel Taub additionally spoke about the still healthy relationship between Israel and the Western allies. He stated Israel still believes the deal is not taking the right direction. He said not only will this not prevent Iran from becoming nuclear it will not even slow them down.

He believes the deal will not affect the infrastructure of Iran because the centrifuges, plutonium reactor and military all remain standing. His concern is when the six months end Iran will be even closer to becoming nuclear. He said the agreement already has fundamental differences between the Western powers and Iran and this will be problematic. Read more: Daniel Taub | Crunchbase and Daniel Taub | Ideamench

Many of the Israeli people are angry over the agreement. The thought process is if in five years time a nuclear bomb is triggered from a suitcase in Madrid or New York the cause will be the signing of the deal.

Daniel Taub does not disagree with this philosophy and has chosen to consider the deal carefully. He believes many of the elements have been oversold and do not have the significance seen at first glance.

One aspect regarding the signing of the deal is Israel now believes the United States is no longer one of their closest allies. They feel there are potential allies that may be of much more importance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *